eRedCap (enhanced Reduced Capability) is the 3GPP Release 18 standard defining a simplified 5G NR device class for mass IoT and M2M connectivity. It replaces LTE Cat-1 and Cat-1bis with a single-antenna, 5 MHz bandwidth design delivering approximately 10 Mbps on 5G Standalone networks.
3GPP Release 18 – Official Definition
eRedCap (enhanced Reduced Capability, formally eNR RedCap) is a 5G New Radio device class defined in 3GPP Release 18. It delivers approximately 10 Mbps peak downlink using a single receive antenna and a maximum 5 MHz channel bandwidth on sub-6 GHz (FR1) 5G SA networks. It is the standardised successor to LTE Category 1 and LTE Cat-1bis for mass IoT and M2M cellular connectivity.
eRedCap is not a niche edge case in the 3GPP roadmap. It is the answer to one of the largest transition challenges in cellular IoT: what replaces the hundreds of millions of LTE Cat-1 and Cat-1bis modules deployed globally in smart meters, asset trackers, vehicle telematics, industrial M2M gateways, and point-of-sale terminals when 4G networks are eventually wound down.
This page covers the technical specification in full, explains where eRedCap sits in the 3GPP IoT family, distinguishes it precisely from its predecessors and relatives, and explains the hardware and network deployment trajectory through to 2027 and beyond.
Where eRedCap Sits in the 3GPP IoT Family
3GPP has progressively defined a layered set of cellular IoT standards from extremely low data rate applications (NB-IoT) through to full 5G NR. eRedCap occupies the middle tier – above LPWAN but well below mainstream 5G – specifically designed for devices that need more than NB-IoT or LTE-M can deliver, but do not justify the complexity and cost of full 5G NR or even Release 17 RedCap.
Key distinction: eRedCap and LTE Cat-1bis deliver nearly identical data rates (~10 Mbps DL / ~5 Mbps UL) and both use a single receive antenna. The critical difference is the network: Cat-1bis runs on 4G LTE, eRedCap runs on 5G NR with a 5G Standalone core. Same device tier, next-generation network.
eRedCap vs RedCap: The Key Differences
eRedCap is frequently conflated with RedCap (Release 17). They are related but distinct – eRedCap is not simply an update to RedCap but a separate, lower-tier device class defined in Release 18 to address a different market segment. Understanding the distinction is essential.
Release 17 RedCap (sometimes called NR-Light) was designed for wearables, industrial sensors, and video surveillance. It reduced complexity compared to a full 5G smartphone UE but remained a capable device with two receive antennas and 10-20 MHz minimum bandwidth – delivering around 150 Mbps peak downlink. That is comparable to a mid-tier 4G handset, not an IoT module.
Release 18 eRedCap takes the complexity reduction further – specifically targeting the much larger market of devices that only need Cat-1-equivalent throughput. The reductions from RedCap to eRedCap are:
eRedCap Technical Specification
The following parameters are defined in 3GPP Release 18. Figures marked NEW IN REL.18 are specific to eRedCap and not present in Release 17 RedCap.
| Parameter | eRedCap Value |
|---|---|
| 3GPP Release | Release 18 (5G Advanced) |
| Formal name | Enhanced NR Reduced Capability (eNR RedCap) |
| Key 3GPP work item | RP-213700 |
| Spec frozen | 2024 |
| Frequency range | FR1 (sub-6 GHz) only – no mmWave |
| Maximum channel bandwidth | 5 MHz (vs 10 MHz for RedCap) |
| Receive antenna configuration | 1T1R (single transmit, single receive) |
| Peak downlink throughput | ~10 Mbps (theoretical maximum) |
| Peak uplink throughput | ~5 Mbps |
| Duplex mode | FDD and TDD; HD-FDD supported NEW IN REL.18 |
| Downlink modulation | Up to 64QAM |
| Uplink modulation | Up to 16QAM |
| HARQ processes | Reduced (lower than standard 5G NR) |
| Network requirement | 5G Standalone (SA) – 5GC required |
| eDRX in RRC_INACTIVE | Supported NEW IN REL.18 |
| Power Saving Mode (PSM) | Supported |
| Connected mode eDRX (C-eDRX) | Supported |
| Carrier aggregation | Not supported |
| MIMO layers | 1 (no spatial multiplexing) |
| eSIM / eUICC | Compatible (SGP.32 applicable) |
| Primary target applications | Smart metering, asset tracking, M2M, telematics, industrial IoT |
Half-Duplex FDD Explained
One of the most commercially significant eRedCap features is HD-FDD support – half-duplex Frequency Division Duplex. In standard FDD operation, a device transmits and receives simultaneously on separate frequency pairs. This requires a duplexer – an expensive RF component that isolates the transmit and receive chains from each other.
HD-FDD allows eRedCap devices to use FDD spectrum (paired uplink/downlink frequencies) but transmit and receive at different times rather than simultaneously. The device switches between transmitting on the uplink frequency and receiving on the downlink frequency. This eliminates the need for the duplexer, reducing both BOM cost and the physical size of the RF front end.
The practical result is cheaper modules. Duplexers and diplexers are among the more expensive RF components in a cellular modem design. Removing the requirement to operate both simultaneously is directly analogous to the simplification that made LTE Cat-1bis cheaper than LTE Cat-1 – Cat-1bis also used a single antenna to eliminate one of the two required receive chains.
Power Saving in eRedCap
Battery longevity is critical for a large fraction of the IoT devices eRedCap targets. Smart meters, asset trackers, and environmental sensors frequently operate on primary batteries for years. eRedCap introduces and enhances several power saving mechanisms:
eDRX in RRC_INACTIVE State
This is specific to Release 18 and is not present in RedCap. Extended Discontinuous Reception (eDRX) in the RRC_INACTIVE state allows a device to sleep for extended periods while remaining registered to the network in a suspended state. Unlike the fully detached state of Power Saving Mode (PSM), the device can be paged and wake to receive data relatively quickly – without going through the full attach and RRC establishment procedure.
The practical advantage over PSM is latency: a device in PSM may be unreachable until its next scheduled wakeup cycle (potentially hours). A device using eDRX in RRC_INACTIVE can be woken by a network page within a configurable window, making it suitable for applications requiring occasional server-initiated communication.
Power Saving Mode (PSM)
PSM allows the device to enter a deep sleep state between scheduled reporting cycles. It remains registered but unreachable. Ideal for sensors reporting once per hour or less, where network-initiated contact is not required between scheduled uploads.
Connected Mode eDRX (C-eDRX)
Allows a device in RRC_CONNECTED state to sleep for extended periods between downlink monitoring cycles, reducing the wake-up duty cycle without a full state transition.
The combination of HD-FDD (reduced RF complexity), single antenna, 5 MHz bandwidth, and eDRX in RRC_INACTIVE makes eRedCap meaningfully more power-efficient than LTE Cat-1 on a like-for-like data transfer basis – in addition to operating on a more modern network infrastructure.
Full Comparison: eRedCap vs the IoT Standards Family
| Parameter | NB-IoT | LTE-M | LTE Cat-1bis | eRedCap (Rel.18) | RedCap (Rel.17) | Full 5G NR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3GPP Release | Rel.13 | Rel.13 | Rel.13 | Rel.18 | Rel.17 | Rel.15+ |
| Network | 4G/5G | 4G/5G | 4G LTE | 5G NR (SA) | 5G NR (SA) | 5G NR (SA) |
| Peak downlink | ~250 Kbps | ~1 Mbps | 10 Mbps | ~10 Mbps | ~150 Mbps | Up to 1+ Gbps |
| Peak uplink | ~250 Kbps | ~1 Mbps | 5 Mbps | ~5 Mbps | ~50 Mbps | Up to 500+ Mbps |
| Max bandwidth | 180 kHz | 1.4-5 MHz | 20 MHz | 5 MHz | 10-20 MHz | Up to 100 MHz |
| Rx antennas | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 (1T1R) | 2 minimum | 2-4+ |
| HD-FDD | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| PSM | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| eDRX in RRC_INACTIVE | No | No | No | Yes (new Rel.18) | No | No |
| Network slicing | No | No | No | Yes (via 5GC) | Yes | Yes |
| Module cost direction | Lowest | Low | Low | Comparable to Cat-1bis | Higher | Highest |
| Hardware now available | Yes | Yes | Yes | 2026 onwards | Yes (2024+) | Yes |
Why eRedCap Requires 5G Standalone
eRedCap devices cannot operate on a 5G Non-Standalone (NSA) network. NSA uses a 4G LTE core network (EPC) with 5G NR radio access layered on top as an additional carrier. The 5G NR radio in an NSA network is an enhancement – the core network functions (authentication, session management, policy, mobility) remain 4G. eRedCap’s reduced complexity signalling and its power saving features – particularly eDRX in RRC_INACTIVE – require the 5G Core (5GC) to function correctly.
5G SA deployment is progressing steadily. In the UK, EE and Vodafone have live 5G SA networks. Globally, major operators in South Korea, Japan, China, the United States, and across Europe have deployed or committed to 5G SA. The eRedCap hardware availability timeline (2026 onwards) aligns closely with the period in which 5G SA coverage will be sufficiently widespread to make eRedCap commercially viable at scale.
Deployment consideration: In regions or locations where 5G SA is not yet available, eRedCap devices will require a fallback strategy – either LTE (4G) fallback or dual-mode chipsets supporting both LTE Cat-1bis and eRedCap. This is a near-term planning consideration for any 2026-2027 device design.
Hardware Landscape: Chipsets and Modules
The eRedCap chipset and module ecosystem is forming ahead of commercial network deployment. Key developments as of 2025-2026:
- Qualcomm: The Snapdragon X35 supports Release 17 RedCap. A successor addressing eRedCap (Rel.18) is in development. Qualcomm has been the leading chipset vendor for RedCap adoption.
- MediaTek: Active in the 5G IoT chipset space with RedCap silicon; eRedCap development in progress.
- Telit Cinterion: A significant module vendor with an eRedCap roadmap alongside existing Cat-1bis and RedCap portfolio. Their FE910C04 uses the Qualcomm X35 (RedCap).
- Sequans Communications: Specialist IoT chipset vendor with established NB-IoT and LTE-M silicon; 5G NR IoT roadmap includes eRedCap.
- Nordic Semiconductor, u-blox, Fibocom, Sierra Wireless, Quectel: All active in cellular IoT module supply chains with eRedCap on product roadmaps.
The first commercial eRedCap modules are expected in M.2 and LCC form factors, targeting industrial and automotive integrations. Consumer IoT device formats (compact SIP modules, LGA packages) will follow as volumes develop through 2027.
3GPP Release Timeline and eRedCap Roadmap
eRedCap Target Applications
eRedCap is purpose-built for applications in the 1-10 Mbps throughput tier that require cellular connectivity with reasonable latency but not the full complexity of mainstream 5G. The use case profile closely mirrors the existing LTE Cat-1 and Cat-1bis installed base.
Smart Metering
Gas, electricity and water AMI meters. Periodic data upload, remote tamper detection, firmware OTA. The UK smart meter programme alone represents tens of millions of units on cellular networks.
Asset Tracking
Vehicle and trailer telematics, cold chain monitoring, high-value asset location. eRedCap provides 5G NR access at Cat-1 module cost with improved power efficiency.
Industrial M2M and SCADA
RTUs, telemetry modems, and M2M gateways in utilities, energy and critical infrastructure. Low data rate but high reliability requirements, long device lifespans.
Point-of-Sale
Payment terminals, vending machines, kiosks. eRedCap delivers faster session establishment and better latency than NB-IoT alternatives while remaining cost-competitive.
Building and Environmental
BMS controllers, HVAC sensors, access control, environmental monitoring. Moderate throughput, infrequent data bursts, long operational life.
Healthcare and Wearables
Remote patient monitoring, personal emergency response, connected medical devices. Battery longevity and compact modem size are primary requirements – eRedCap delivers both.
Migrating from LTE Cat-1bis to eRedCap
For device designers and procurement teams currently specifying LTE Cat-1bis hardware, eRedCap is the natural forward specification – but the timeline matters. LTE Cat-1bis remains the right choice for any design that needs to ship and operate reliably today. The eRedCap ecosystem is not yet commercially mature.
The practical migration path is:
- Short term (now to 2026): Specify Cat-1bis for devices shipping today. Good global coverage, proven module supply chain, extensive operator certification. Use Cat-1bis modules with an eye to end-of-life planning around 2030-2032 as 4G spectrum refarming accelerates.
- Medium term (2026-2027): Evaluate first-generation eRedCap modules as they emerge. Prioritise dual-mode designs (Cat-1bis + eRedCap) for products with long lifecycle requirements. Confirm 5G SA coverage in your target deployment regions before committing.
- Long term (2027+): eRedCap becomes the default mid-tier IoT specification as 5G SA coverage becomes widespread and module costs converge with Cat-1bis. Legacy LTE Cat-1/Cat-1bis devices face increasing migration pressure as operators accelerate 4G wind-down.
Design note: The pin/pad compatibility between Cat-1bis and eRedCap modules is vendor-specific – it is not guaranteed by 3GPP. Check with your module vendor whether their eRedCap product will be form-factor compatible with their Cat-1bis equivalent. Some vendors are designing for drop-in mechanical compatibility to simplify migration.
eRedCap and eSIM / eUICC
eRedCap devices are fully compatible with eSIM and eUICC provisioning. The GSMA SGP.32 specification – IoT eUICC architecture – is directly applicable to eRedCap devices, enabling over-the-air SIM profile management without physical SIM replacement. This is relevant for large-scale IoT deployments where physical SIM changes are operationally expensive.
For more on eSIM in the IoT context, see euicc.co.uk and the GSMA’s SGP.32 IoT eSIM specification documentation.
Network Slicing and 5G Core Benefits
Because eRedCap requires a 5G Standalone core, devices automatically gain access to 5G Core features that are unavailable on 4G LTE. The most commercially relevant for IoT is network slicing.
Network slicing allows operators to partition a single physical network into multiple virtual networks, each with different QoS characteristics. An eRedCap smart meter deployment could be placed on a slice optimised for high device density, low-bandwidth, high-reliability communications – entirely separate from the slice used by 5G smartphones or broadband CPE. This is a significant capability for critical infrastructure operators who need assured service levels for grid communications or SCADA telemetry.
For more on 5G network slicing and its applications in IoT, see 5gslicing.co.uk.
eRedCap, RedCap, and the Wider 5G Reduced Capability Family
It is worth being precise about terminology, as the marketing language in this space can be loose:
- RedCap = 3GPP Release 17. NR-Light. ~150 Mbps. 2 Rx antennas. Wearables, industrial sensors, video surveillance. Hardware available from 2024.
- eRedCap = 3GPP Release 18. Enhanced Reduced Capability. ~10 Mbps. 1 Rx antenna. 5 MHz bandwidth. LTE Cat-1 replacement. Hardware from 2026.
- ultraRedCap = informal term for Release 19 NTN-capable 5G NR IoT devices with satellite fallback potential. Not a 3GPP official term. In development.
These are three distinct device classes at different points in the standardisation and commercialisation cycle. For the Release 17 RedCap standard, operator deployment coverage and available hardware, see 5gredcap.co.uk.
Standards and Authority Sources
- 3GPP Release 18 – Official work item documentation (3gpp.org)
- GSMA Mobile IoT Overview – NB-IoT, LTE-M and 5G NR IoT standards
- GSMA IoT – 5G IoT portfolio, RedCap and eRedCap positioning (gsma.com)
- GSMA SGP.32 IoT eSIM specification (gsma.com)
- Ericsson: RedCap and eRedCap explained (ericsson.com)
- Telit Cinterion: eRedCap – the natural 5G successor to LTE Cat-1bis (telit.com)
- everythingRF: What is eRedCap (everythingrf.com)
